new item!
 

please add this pro stamps block Rangers team set!FAGETABOUIT!

http://www.juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=605

Now if you're going to argue that there should be a separate entry for this, I would argue that the only entry for this should be for what you've pictured here. Remove the picture of just the one stamp and replace it with the images that you've uploaded.

the powers that be have spoken!

http://juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=96052

http://juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=308

LETS HERE YOUR AGRUMENT ON THE ABOVE 2
GENIUS:mad:

like i stated before,if it is not their's it will not be ADDED!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry, the stamp was modified, torn from the oter items it was attached to. That is different from removing a card from a box or a package. Besides, the post box is on the list, what is the problem?

Why do you have to be so rude anyway? I don't modify the list or decide what goes on it any longer. If you feel the need to insult me, don't bother coming to this website.

Agggggggggggggg! Wrong Answer Hans! Would You Like To Go For Double Jeopardy Where The Stakes Get Really High?

No One Else Has The Set,or The Set Would Have Been Put On In The 1st Place.i Will Go One Better I Will Remove The Set Image! I WILL NO LONGER WASTE MY TIME PUTTING SCANS HERE. OF ANY THING. I WAS NOT BEING RUDE I WAS BEING FUNNY AND SARCASTIC! I DO NOT HAVE TO BE RUDE TO YOU,YOU HAVE A WAY OF DOING THAT TO YOURSELF!

I have 3 sets of the stamps, not singles...I figured it still counted as the Juan stamp, but if it calls for the set, I'd be glad to add as the set and remove it from the single.

Great :)

This was rude

i have the set, but i dont have the single...... or do I???

i dont care either way, but we need to be consistant. maybe we should move all tghe existing proofs to the oddball section and go ahead and list the others??? I would like to see my 4 catchets listed also since 3 others are already on here.

Please send me the pictures of you four catchets, I would love to see them (adelith67@hotmail.com), I've 5 more that are not listed. Like Robert said why waste more time placing pictures if they are not going to be posted, I send a picture of the Fleer Sunoco Proof which is on the list, and nobody post it. :confused:

Look...I am really sorry. Jonas, Freddie and I have the ability to add items to the list. Freddie does not have an active role anymore and Jonas is hardly on the site anymore.

I have been really busy at work and with football season, gymnastics, and piano lessons for my kids, my nights and weekends have been crammed too.

I will add all of the pics and items soon. Please keep adding pictures to the threads. I promise I will eventually get to all of them.

Kevin can add items and pictures as well. Rob can add pictures too so don't dump it all onto Mike.

I have the set but only counted the Juan stamp as part of my 538.

538

When Freddy gave me the "power" to add items I agreed that I would only add if we all agreed it should be listed...there seems to be great debate on the "proofs" or "cutouts" which is why I didn't add them...my opinion is the same as Chris' if we add some we should add all..I also have no problem adding pics but I don't know how to do it from someone else's post...I personally would like to see everything listed in one way or another as I love looking at all the unique things everyone has(except Rob's auto'ed pinto...lol)

Kevin

http://i24.ebayimg.com/07/i/001/11/ba/8956_2.JPG
http://i12.ebayimg.com/05/i/001/11/ba/8ce7_2.JPG
I have this in my hands now.. Can someone add it?

#46 2001 Fleer Showcase Legacy 18/50
 

Hello again:
I'd just receive this card, but I think is an error card since has what it looks like a misprint, please check it out and decide how should it be listed.

Card added.

Cachets added.

Rob, You could make the same argument for the 1992 High 5 cards as the Pro Stamps. They actually came in a panel and are listed, but only as a panel, not as individual cards as well. I think we should add the picture of the Pro Stamps sheet showing that you might have the full sheet or the individual stamp.

Mike, thanks for the additions. Chris <><

Oddball 1993 Arlington Stadium Last Game Autographed Cachet
 

Oddball 1993 Arlington Stadium Last Game Autographed Cachet.

I know there is already at least one other similar item like this on the list, but none like it belong on the list. Although I think it is a neat piece, the oddball item must at least have Juan's picture on it. If we add this then we should add almost any item with Juan's signature on it , i.e. bats, hats, pictures, scraps of toilet paper.

If we are going to be consistent, then I think we need to consistently keep these types of items off the list.

Got it!:cool:
What about this?
#46 2001 Fleer Showcase Legacy 18/50 Double Print
is on page 2 of this Thread.

Where do we draw the line with printing errors!! I mean seriously, this is getting ridiculous. I saw one post mentioning that on a card they have "the shadow is a little different" and that it should be added as a variation. Really?? Has it come to that??

When the printer screws up I would perhaps call it quirky, maybe even unique, but certainly not a legit variation.

It's the same with coin collectors. A coin that is double struck or misstruck does carry a premium, but no Buffalo Nickel collector would say they need a misstruck coin to complete their collection.

I just think we are taking the printing goofs a little too far.

this is the LAST post i will ever DO! YOU ARE VERY WRONG on coin collectors stance on errors! they are more collected then the reg,coins! i know because i collected! a 3 legged buffalo nicke is worth this!
http://cgi.ebay.com/1937-D-BUFFALO-N...d=p3286.c0.m14
the reg one is worth $2 in the same condition! same with a 1955 double die cent or the 1972 double die cent! and so on and so on!
how ever i can not beleve there is NO COMMON SENSE WHEN ADDING CARDS! THIS DOES NOT BELONG ANYWHERE BUT THE TRASH BIN!
http://www.juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=96092
NOT A MISPRINT BUT MISCUT! WHY DO YOU THINK IT SOLD FOR ONLY $1?
EVERY TIME I POSE AN ITEM THAT I HAVE NEVER SEEN I GET BLASTED AS A %^&*%#@ IDIOT!I AM SICK OF IT! THERE IS STILL NO CASE OF WHY THE POST SET IS ON THE ODDBALL LIST AND NOT THE STAMP SET. OH BUT THE STAMP WAS REMOVED! WELL EXCUSE ME BUT SO WAS THE POST CARD!!!!!!! BEAM ME UP SCOTTY!!!!!!!!!! SEE YA!

Would you like some cheese with that WHINE!?!?

At His Excellency's Request, I have removed the 1994 Topps Boxed Set and added the 1996 Pro Stamps Sheet.

I hope everyone can settle down now and play well with others.

http://i3.ebayimg.com/03/i/001/10/d4/4d20_1.JPG

thid needs to be added..... it is not numbered, and says promo on the back where the regular one is serial numbered. this one also has a diamond embedded on the the front.

Can you put a scan of the back on this thread?

I sent it to you email

please add the 94 post set back on i did not want it removed,i think it belongs on the list!
here is another card i will get flack for MAYBE!
I have known about this card when it came out in 1997 it is a topps 1st team all stars "STAR BURST"!
I JUST GOT ANOTHER ONE AND NOW HAVE 3!
THIS CARD HAS TWICE THE FIREWORKS DISPLAY IN THE BACKGROUND AS THE REG,CARD! please see scan.all 3 i have are the same. if some time in the near future it could be added i would be very grateful. you all need to under stand on variations.go thru 55000 cards of the same player and see what you find! you just see 1 to 3 cards and asume the are all the same.it is like the 97 fleer soaring stars glowing. in 97 dealers told me i was nutz! when i showed them the card.then it came out in beckett! the topps is just as rare! see scan! i will put it nex to the reg card! also a 1998 finest double printed,and a 1998 sp authentic sheer dominance the "s" in the 1st silver is not there. yea i know the "r" in the last silver is covered! they are all like that! thought i would cover all bases.

WOW!!!I have only 1 of the 97 Topps all star cards and just looked it up...It is the same as the "EXTRA" fireworks card that Rob shows...for sure it is different and obviously not a printing error...

Kevin

I can't see the diamond, where is it?

between his waste and the word promint

my wife said something very similar when i proposed!

Lol! :d

Now this is what I would call a proof card.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=400006230153

Should it be added to the list as such?? If so, does it belong in 1997 or in the Oddball section. Feedback please.

Oddball. Every card had something like this during production, same with the backdoor plates.

I agree oddball list...What about the 3 cards Rob listed...I think they all should be added...any opinions??

Kevin

Rob's cards are either errors or variations and so they go on the main list. As long as we have one error/variation on the main list, then I see no argument against including any other error or variation that is found. We can't only have the "famous" errors, such as the 1990 reverse Donruss.