Juan Gonzalez Online

Juan Gonzalez Online (http://www.juangone.com/home.php)
-   Juan Gonzalez (http://www.juangone.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   new item! (http://www.juangone.com/showthread.php?t=480)

nosterbor 10-25-2008 02:37 PM

new item!
 
please add this pro stamps block Rangers team set!FAGETABOUIT!

freddie 10-26-2008 04:38 AM

http://www.juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=605

Now if you're going to argue that there should be a separate entry for this, I would argue that the only entry for this should be for what you've pictured here. Remove the picture of just the one stamp and replace it with the images that you've uploaded.

nosterbor 10-26-2008 05:33 AM

the powers that be have spoken!

http://juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=96052

http://juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=308

LETS HERE YOUR AGRUMENT ON THE ABOVE 2
GENIUS:mad:

like i stated before,if it is not their's it will not be ADDED!!!!!!!!!!

freddie 10-26-2008 05:37 AM

Sorry, the stamp was modified, torn from the oter items it was attached to. That is different from removing a card from a box or a package. Besides, the post box is on the list, what is the problem?

Why do you have to be so rude anyway? I don't modify the list or decide what goes on it any longer. If you feel the need to insult me, don't bother coming to this website.

nosterbor 10-26-2008 05:43 AM

Agggggggggggggg! Wrong Answer Hans! Would You Like To Go For Double Jeopardy Where The Stakes Get Really High?

nosterbor 10-26-2008 05:48 AM

No One Else Has The Set,or The Set Would Have Been Put On In The 1st Place.i Will Go One Better I Will Remove The Set Image! I WILL NO LONGER WASTE MY TIME PUTTING SCANS HERE. OF ANY THING. I WAS NOT BEING RUDE I WAS BEING FUNNY AND SARCASTIC! I DO NOT HAVE TO BE RUDE TO YOU,YOU HAVE A WAY OF DOING THAT TO YOURSELF!

Rafferity 10-26-2008 08:23 AM

I have 3 sets of the stamps, not singles...I figured it still counted as the Juan stamp, but if it calls for the set, I'd be glad to add as the set and remove it from the single.

freddie 10-26-2008 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nosterbor (Post 4138)
No One Else Has The Set,or The Set Would Have Been Put On In The 1st Place.i Will Go One Better I Will Remove The Set Image! I WILL NO LONGER WASTE MY TIME PUTTING SCANS HERE. OF ANY THING. I WAS NOT BEING RUDE I WAS BEING FUNNY AND SARCASTIC! I DO NOT HAVE TO BE RUDE TO YOU,YOU HAVE A WAY OF DOING THAT TO YOURSELF!

Great :)

This was rude
Quote:

LETS HERE YOUR AGRUMENT ON THE ABOVE 2
GENIUS:mad:

mcabee1 10-26-2008 09:19 PM

i have the set, but i dont have the single...... or do I???

mcabee1 10-26-2008 09:21 PM

i dont care either way, but we need to be consistant. maybe we should move all tghe existing proofs to the oddball section and go ahead and list the others??? I would like to see my 4 catchets listed also since 3 others are already on here.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.