|
|||||||||||||
#21
|
||||
|
||||
I would consider it as 2 different....one complete and the other cut out. Just as sheets, complete. I have the box(never opened) and the card. Bought them when they 1st came out. Wanted one for display the other for my folder.
__________________
"I'm Invincible" Jerry |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
i would love to have the box,THANK YOU!
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
I am not saying that having the box isn't cool. I would love to have it too, but it is NOT A different item!!! Uncut sheets are really neat, but they are not different. Period.
I say we drop this because you are never going to convince me that they are different and I am never going to convince you that they are the same so it is pointless.
__________________
Mike Gonzaleznut |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Error Cards!
1- #3 1997 Fleer Soaring Stars Glowing Missing Silver Foil.
2- #3 1997 Fleer Soaring Stars Glowing Missing Silver Foil Back. 3- #RC9 1998 Stadium Club Royal Court Double Print Of Barry Bonds. 4- #RC9 1998 Stadium Club Royal Court Double Print Of Barry Bonds Back. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Added, thanks.
Jonas |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Under Rob's theory, shouldn't this be a separate item on the list as well??
http://cgi.ebay.com/1990-Donruss-Rac...QQcmdZViewItem NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!
__________________
Mike Gonzaleznut |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
1994 post 1994 post 1994 post 1994 post 1994 post! and yes the racks are diff not the same did i ask to have them put on NOOOOOOOOO!.look that word up "same" sorry but you just will never win this argument,where is the photo of Flex Jose and Chuck Knoblauch on the single card.they are the same. "identical,equal"
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you very much Jonas! I'd won the following please review it and decide wether this should or should not be added.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...0294%26fvi%3D1 |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Its always been my opinion that its only a different item if I couldnt make it myself. If I can cut it or erase it to get the same effect, its not a different item. You can erase the ink off of any early Upper Deck card and call it a blank back. You cannot do that with a Topps card. The material is different so a blank back Topps card is a variation but a 1990 UD is not (again, my opinion). The magazine and box cards are not different although its cool to have both pics listed. Most of those type cards were not issued anyway but uncut and someone then cut them. The proof cards are different as you cannot add paper to get it like that and the sheets were not distributed to us common folks. As I said b4, I ran across uncut Mothers cookies from 91 & 92. I would like the pic added for all to see (when I get around to scanning it), but under the same listing as the cut version as they are the same card. Just my thoughts and nobody has to agree as it doesnt really matter if a few get left off or a few get added that shouldnt.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
is this a proof? i have never seen any thing like it,it is clear plastic,same size as the reg card,it looks like a negitive!i do not know of a process where it can be faked.however all the proofs of this type would not have the foil copy on them the ultra logo and his name. this is added later. i think it is a reproduction and maybe a fake. need some info please.it is very cool!!!
Last edited by nosterbor; 02-05-2009 at 04:55 PM. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|