variations - are we missing any?

[freddie]

I believe this card is pushing it

http://www.juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=96223

The text is lighter as well, it just isn't the logo.

[gonzologan]

I Agree

Originally Posted by freddie

I believe this card is pushing it

http://www.juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=96223

The text is lighter as well, it just isn't the logo.

[adelith]

I listed based on the list of cards from the original message "variations we are missing" When I check my doubles I notice the difference.

Originally Posted by freddie

I believe this card is pushing it

http://www.juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=96223

The text is lighter as well, it just isn't the logo.

[nosterbor]

did any one BOTHER to look at the color of the B O R D E R ??

they are the same shade of R E D !!!!!!!!!!!!!

[freddie]

I did notice the border but I still think it walks the line as a valid variation.

Maybe they printed the borders in one run and printed the rest in another run.

[nosterbor]

Jonas where are you?

[jjt111]

My opinion is that the framed text and background are lighter and should be added to the list if found in quantity so that more than just one exists. I would like to add one to my collection. Many dollars and eyes are spent to match print run colors and poor board quality or after print lighting wouldn’t alter just one area like that so I expect it was an approved 2nd run tell tale.

[jzk_ksy]

I found a couple of 91 Bowman that have no period after the "INC" as well as a few that do have it...I'll post pics later...

Kevin

[mcabee1]

i farted on one of my 1991 fleer cards - then i left another one in the rain and it bloated all up - do these count?

[jzk_ksy]

I must be getting old...upon furthe inspection all my 91 bowman dupes do have the period after the INC..